Skipping to Conclusions: Post-Avengers MCU

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

by Anika

Iron Man 3 opens this week and ushers in a new era: the Post-Avengers Marvel Cinematic Universe. Who knew we’d get here when Iron Man premiered five years ago?

Well, probably Robert Downey Jr. and definitely Tony Stark.

Well, probably Robert Downey Jr. and definitely Tony Stark.

When my brother saw Pepper Potts suiting up in the TV ads for Iron Man 3 he wrote to ask me if I’d secretly written the script.

They are the cutest co-stars in the world.

They are the cutest co-stars in the world.

Sadly, no, but it brings us to the question: Now that the universe is established who do we want to see?

an image of Leonardo DiCaprio

I’m thinking Doctor Strange.

We know that Falcon and Agent 13 are being introduced in Captain America: The Winter Soldier.

So who else now wants Rebel Wilson to be an Avenger?

So who else now wants Rebel Wilson to be an Avenger?

If I haven't mentioned before, I strongly approve of this casting.

If I haven’t mentioned before, I strongly approve of this casting.

As well as, of course, The Winter Soldier.

Blatant excuse to post Sebastian Stan with Winter Soldier hair (!!!)

Blatant excuse to post Sebastian Stan with Winter Soldier hair (!!!)

There is an Ant-Man movie.

All I want out of an Ant-Man movie part 1: Scott and Cassie Lang.

All I want out of an Ant-Man movie part 1: Scott and Cassie Lang.

All I want out of an Ant-Man movie part 2: Robots (Vision).

All I want out of an Ant-Man movie part 2: Robots (Vision).

All I want out of an Ant-Man movie part 3: Ashley Greene as Janet Van Dyne.

All I want out of an Ant-Man movie part 3: Ashley Greene as Janet Van Dyne.

And there are plenty of rumors for new Avengers…

Carol Danvers is seriously the easiest character to drop into ANY post-Avengers MCU film.

Carol Danvers is seriously the easiest character to drop into ANY post-Avengers MCU film.

MAXIMOFF TWINS!!

MAXIMOFF TWINS!!

(Just saying)

(Just saying)

In conclusion: I am more than ready for Phase II of the MCU. What about you?

Skipping to Conclusions: Once Upon a Time Graphic Novel

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

by Anika

Marvel has announced a Once Upon a Time graphic novel. Let me repeat that. Marvel has announced a Once Upon a Time GRAPHIC NOVEL!

Dive into the immersive world of ABC’s “Once Upon a Time” like never before as Marvel Entertainment and Disney-ABC Television Group are proud to announce ONCE UPON A TIME: SHADOW OF THE QUEEN, an all-new original graphic novel hardcover inspired by the popular series. Plotted by series writer and co-producer Dan Thomsen and co-written by Corinna Bechko, this landmark release fits into the official continuity of “Once Upon a Time” and features the lush art of Nimit Malavia, Vasilis Lolos, Mike Del Mundo, Stephanie Hans and Mike Henderson

Okay, there are many obvious reasons why this is exciting for me. I’ve mentioned how important the show is to me and even gone so far as to suggest that Peter Parker and Henry Mills should totally meet up (aside: in that same vein, Miles Morales and Henry Mills should totally be BFF. They can bond over legacies and expectations and learning the world you know is not the only one there is. Someone make this happen). I love pretty much everything involved in this endeavor: fairy tales, comic books, Marvel, Disney, Storybrooke… here are some of the various artists’ work:

Michael Del Mundo

Michael Del Mundo

Nimit Malavia

Nimit Malavia

Stephanie Hans

Stephanie Hans

So that will be beautiful!

And then, here’s the story:

In ONCE UPON A TIME: SHADOW OF THE QUEEN, the Evil Queen has, quite literally, captured the Huntsman’s heart. With the Huntsman a slave, experience the never-before-told tale behind their twisted relationship—and what happens when a good man is forced to do bad. And when Regina cooks up yet another devious plan to capture Snow White the Huntsman comes face-to-face with his past, including an independent spirit in Red Riding Hood that just may match his own. Can these two break free of the forces that bind them and save Snow White?

It’s an Evil Queen story! It’s Hunstman backstory! Including an independent spirit in Red Riding Hood! I cannot contain my glee!

an illustration from Henry's book

an illustration from Henry’s book

But there is one more conclusion I am skipping to. Disney as Marvel’s parent company has been great for the movies and I love the abundance of Spider-Man merchandise alongside Cinderella merchandise in my local mall but the impact on comics hasn’t been as positively reviewed. But this move is exciting for me. This is Disney using Marvel to expand their television audience with comics and maybe, just maybe, their comic book audience with fairy tales. Once Upon a Time is extremely comic-booky. All the complaints (and/or commendations) about it’s wide scope and cast of thousands and non-linear plot and spectrum of grey characters and even the obsession with Daddy Issues are things that comic book fans are used to because comic books, and especially Marvel comic books, are built on them. This is Disney marketing (or at least aiming) comic books to their Princess fans. To the people who buy their dolls and go to their parks and watch their Sunday night family hour show. To moms and little girls. To me and my daughter. And I CANNOT WAIT to buy it. Where do I preorder?

Skipping to Conclusions: Grant Morrison’s Wonder Woman

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.


With his New 52 run on Action Comics coming to an end, Grant Morrison is making the rounds with the comics press. And once again, Morrison is talking about his yet to be officially announced Wonder Woman project. He’s keeping the details very vague, but Morrison has been talking about Wonder Woman a lot. Well, maybe not a LOT. But enough that I can start skipping to conclusions about it!

Opinions on Morrison as a writer aside, he has written some defining comics for both Batman and Superman. DC giving Morrison the reigns on Wonder Woman means that maybe, just maybe, they’re taking Diana as seriously as Bruce and Clark. Yes, I know she’s part of The Trinity, but let’s be honest, the Amazon rarely gets the same red carpet treatment that Supes and Bats do. So seeing Morrison’s name attached to Wonder Woman means DC is treating this project as a priority. And that is a good thing.

Personally, I like Morrison’s work. He’s not necessarily one of those creators whose books I absolutely HAVE TO pick up, but All-Star Superman and Batman and Robin are some of my absolute favorite comics. So depending what the project is, I’ll at least check it out. The thing about Morrison is he GETS superheroes. He gets superhero comics. And he unabashedly, unironically loves them. And that’s what I Iike most about his writing; it’s what makes his stories compelling for me. I think Diana’s in good hands with Morrison.

Now. Here’s the controversial bit.

This is what Morrison told Entertainment Weekly on what he’s planning on for the Amazon Princess:

Wonder Woman came out of this alternative sexuality, and that’s why they were so popular. Once the editors realized, “There’s a lot of tying up in these stories, we should tell him to slow down on this” — as soon as they stopped all that stuff, Wonder Woman sales declined, unsurprisingly. When Marston died, the sales never quite recovered.

A lot of great writers and artists have worked on Wonder Woman. Brian Azzarello’s doing a great Greek Myth-flavored take right now. But something of what [Marston] brought to it was never there again. Especially when the TV series came along: Linda Carter did such a brilliant job of doing Wonder Woman for TV, but she was kind of Mary Tyler Moore, you know? She wasn’t a sexual creature, really. Wonder Woman’s had to represent women without really having much of a sex life. It’s ridiculous! Superman’s got Lois, and Batman’s got all these fetish girls he runs around with. Wonder Woman’s kind of suffered, because that aspect of her, a sense of her humanity, has been taken from her.

This sound bite has rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. The first time I read it, my gut reaction was:

But when I stop and think about for a bit, I think maybe he’s on to something. Just hear me out.

Over the years, Diana has kind of  been placed on a pedestal. At this point she’s up so high that she’s not relatable, and sometimes, not particularly likable. People get caught up in how much of an icon she is that they forget she’s a real person (not real-real, but you know what I mean). She has feelings and she loves people. She loves humanity enough that she’s given up her life in Themyscira to build a home in our world. A woman like that is going to get into some romantic entanglements. She’s going to have sex. Probably, occasionally, it’ll be with the wrong person. Diana is capable of great love. And with that comes some sexytimes.

On top of that, Wonder Woman is the embodiment of the empowered woman. I think seeing her in control of her sexuality would be a good thing. Portraying her as a chaste demi-goddess only perpetuates the idea that sex is something to be ashamed of. And believe, that’s not doing anyone any favors.

But. Because there is a but. She cannot, CAN NOT, be objectified in this story. If DC or Morrison pulls a New 52 Catwoman, there’s going to be a BIG problem. I’d like to think we’ve gotten passed the need to say that in the comics community; that we’ve learned the difference between sexy and objectification. But it’s still a gray area for a lot of people, so I felt the need to put that out there.

On the bright side, here’s another bit of what Morrison said to EW:

Usually I don’t do masses of research, but for Wonder Woman, I’ve actually been working my way through the entire history of feminism. I want this to be f—ing serious, you know? I want this to be really, really good, to reflect not only what women think, but what men think of women. I’m trying to do something really different from what’s been done with the character before.

I like this! He’s at least trying to get into the head of a woman who’s a feminist. This is a good thing. And I trust him on it. I really do. I think he can write her a story she deserves. I think he’ll give us a fun, sexy Wonder Woman, full of moxie.

There are still a lot of variables. The artist will play a HUGE roll in this project. It needs to be someone who’s not going to draw Diana in break-back pose every panel, with overly pouty lips and heaving breasts. I’d love, love, LOVE to see Amanda Connor drawing this book. DC’s senior editorial needs to be on board with Morrison’s plan and not try to crowbar extra sexyness into the comic. Everyone, not just Morrison, should probably read a bit of feminist theory before starting this project.

As far as Wonder Woman projects go, I’m probably a bit more excited about Allan Heinberg’s Amazon pilot. But this could be really good. Really, really good.

Skipping to Conclusions: “The Sailor Moon Reboot”

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

by Marie

There is nothing quite like hearing an echo from the past, especially an echo from childhood.

It is the closest thing we have to time travel—for now, at least. The moment may not last for more than a few seconds, but it’s enough to carry us off to a more innocent time. A time before we learned self-doubt, and “uncertainty” and “limitations” were specters that only haunted the world of adults.

It was a time where magic was a matter of fact, not fiction. And the act of believing that you could do anything was as easy as taking a breathful of air. But even as we grew older, we hung on to these moments like keepsakes. And every once in a while, we hear an echo. Then we take these moments out of their locked drawers to remind ourselves of where we have been and who we once were.

This is exactly this kind of “time travel” that I believe makes people excited about reboots, regardless of the franchise. Cynics would say that the film and television industry capitalize on this nostalgia. After all, reboots have built-in audience who are ready and willing to spend their dollars to see what new interpretation their studios came up with—regardless of quality or respect to the original.

And yes, there is a certain degree of truth in this. There are many franchises that I could name off the top of my head that seemed to be solely motivated by money. But then, there are those franchises that are motivated by so much more than that.

Last year, The Mary Sue reported on the reboot of the Sailor Moon franchise. You can read the details here. The premier of the new series is slated for 2013. No new details have been released since then, but you can imagine the fan speculation that has been circulating the Internet ever since.

Now before you start singing the theme song (and I will probably join you), I want to take a few moments to share just what this means to fans like myself.

One summer, almost 15 years ago, I saw the English-dubbed debut of Sailor Moon and felt for the first time what it meant to be a fan. The feeling went beyond just “liking a show.” No, it was much deeper than that. In cases like these, I hate to fall back on clichés like “capturing my heart” but that is exactly what this series did. You know that you’ve become a fan when you hold the characters as close to your heart as you would your actual friends. And if you think this counts as borderline obsession (and admittedly, that borderline is very thin), I’d like to present you with this passage from author Nancy Kress’ Dynamic Characters:

“There are characters in fiction so real, so palpable, that we can reach out and touch them our whole lives…They have a solidity and a humanity that calls up answering emotions in us, and we know we could have been much poorer if we’d never met them.”

Recently, I wrote a post on Magical Girl manga. For anyone whose seen Sailor Moon, it is quite obvious how iconic this series was to the genre. In truth, it was a series that pioneered a lot of what makes the Magical Girl genre so compelling. Although Magical Girl manga existed prior to Sailor Moon (there’s a slew of titles that date back as early as the 1960’s), the series creator Naoko Takeuchi took the genre a step further by emphasizing two elements:

  • Magical Girls working together as part of a team.
  • Magical Girls using their special abilities for a common good, usually to fight evil.

The series thrived during a time of “Girl Power” in the West. If that rouses any unpleasant memories from the girl bands/boy bands era, I will only say that given the times we live in now—where reasonably well-educated politicians are still unable to understand rape—a little “Girl Power” wouldn’t hurt.

In any case, the series itself touched on themes that I feel are as relevant today as they were 20 years ago. Themes like friendship, courage, perseverance in the face of impossible odds, and the importance of staying true to oneself. In that vein, I feel that Sailor Moon had a very formulative influence on many young girls in its prime, and it’s my hope that the reboot will inherit that same endearing quality.

Since there is little to no news on the reboot, there is only so much that I could go on to speculate. That being said, the following is a list of things that aren’t so much as what’s likely to happen, but what I would like to happen:

1. A Prequel Arc

Many fans know that Sailor Moon and Co. once lived on the Moon Kingdom, but for some many spoilerific reasons were kicked out and reincarnated on Earth—without any memories of their past lives. A prequel arc could show what life was like in the Royal Court (which if the picture below is to be believed, is something like living in Disney World). It could also show how the Scouts became defenders of the galaxy. After all, did they earn their titles via some kind of proving, as with a tournament? Were their superhuman powers inherited or bestowed?

Supposedly, the other Scouts were princesses of their own respective planets. It would be interesting to see what other outer-space kingdoms existed, whether there were any political intrigues, and what the laws and customs were for those times. It would be like Game of Thrones, except in outer space and with more glitter.

2.More Love Interests.

If you’ve ever seen the anime, you’ll know that the love between Usagi and Mamoru (or Serena and Darien in the English dub) straight up dominated the series. Their relationship has been put to the test multiple times under varying circumstances, the most notable of which was when they encountered their future selves.

But in my opinion, the other Scouts needed some lovin’ too. There were a few episodes here and there where they may have had crushes, but those usually went no farther than a season. It would be nice if they each could find the love of their lives, or at least form a meaningful relationship outside their circle of friends that could act as a nice foil or provide an interesting complication.

Obviously, this doesn’t mean that I would like the show to be saturated with boy drama—but I feel that if a nice balance could be found, it would be another way to add dimension to the other Scouts’ characters.

3. More of the Outer Sailor Scouts

We don’t really get to meet the Outer Sailor Scouts until later arcs and that’s a shame. In case you didn’t know, they are: Sailor Pluto, Sailor Uranus, Sailor Neptune, and Sailor Saturn (pictured below). Really, these characters are interesting in that they form a secondary, almost rogue, faction. But while they follow the same code of honor, what their goals are and how they operate are not always aligned with the Inner Sailor Scouts.

I feel this tension could not only be more explored, but also amplified—perhaps even in an arc of its own where they meet even more Sailor Scouts from the farthest reaches of the universe. It would show what it truly means to be a Sailor Scout and can clarify what vision or ideals they stand for.

4. Finally, a post-arc.

Or at least a re-imagining of the Stars arc. It had differentiated from the manga to a point that even Naoko Takeuchi was disappointed. For example, the Sailor Stars were originally minor characters but played principle roles in the anime. They also did not switch from male to female, but I am okay with this even if the creator isn’t because I am all for more positive transgender representation in the media.

If a re-imagining is out of the question, then at the very least a post-arc could take place where series left off. Here, Usagi and the rest of her friends could be trying to balance their alter egos with the more demanding rigors and restrictions of college. Or, it could be the arc that shows the beginning of how Usagi later comes into power. I mean c’mon, at one point, she becomes Queen of the Earth. That could present a whole host of interesting conflicts such as Usagi finally revealing her identity to the world at large.

But really, even if NONE of these things happen—I would still tune in to watch the reboot, if not out of passion then out of loyalty (or both). I can honestly say that the show has had such a positive impact on my childhood, and for that I will always be grateful.

I can only hope the same from other fans.

Skipping to Conclusions: “Doctor Who” 50th Anniversary Special

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

by Jessica

Recently there has been a lot of buzz about the upcoming 50th anniversary of Doctor Who. Personally, I’ve become a very conflicted Who viewer ever since Steven Moffat took over–I still watch every episode, but by the end of most of them I’m usually filled with a sense of at least disappointment, if not fuming anger. But here is not the place to discuss my qualms with Mr. Moffat! Rather, I thought it was important to give you an idea of where I’m coming from as I break down my expectations for the anniversary festivities beginning this Fall.

We’ll start with the big news: all surviving doctors to return for the special (hopefully). Even a curmudgeon like me can’t deny that this would be utterly amazing. One fun part of the Whovian community is the bickering over which Doctor is best. Everyone has a favorite, and I’d be excited to see how the fandom reacts to their Doctor being a part of an ensemble. I’m also looking forward to getting a glimpse of what Doctor Who was like before the 2005 relaunch. My exposure to early episodes has been limited, and I think a great starting off point for me and other fans who are looking to check out Who’s first forty years is to see which older Doctor strikes a chord with us. I’ll admit that I am most excited to salivate over David Tennant reprising his role as the 10th Doctor. That fix alone might be enough to get me through any amount of shenanigans Moffat might get up to.

Still, there are a couple of downsides to this news: one, that there is a possibility that the BBC might not be able to get all the actors to return (boooo) and two, that the new writers of the show won’t be able to capture the cadence of the former Doctors they haven’t written before. I sincerely hope that neither of these things occurs. As much as I want to strangle Moffat sometimes for some of the changes he’s made to Who, the man has always had style and grand vision. If he’s going to show it off anywhere, it’s going to be in this special, and it’s going to be awesome, especially if all former (living) Doctors are involved. The last time there were so many doctors on screen together was in 1983 for the twentieth anniversary special, so if you ask me, it’s about time for a reunion.

Now, on to the other speculations, rumors and otherwise!

The Special will be in 3D

Hmmm…this is an interesting one. I suppose as is the case with anything else that’s in 3D, I’m fine with it if it works. Of course, as is also the case with anything else in 3D, it almost always doesn’t. It won’t affect me too much since I have no capability to watch a television program in 3D, but it is notable that they have decided to tackle the challenge of filming a 3D episode. It seems to indicate a “go big or go home” attitude for the anniversary that I’m totally fine with.

The Special *might* be Live

The only place I’ve seen this around the internet are in some quotes from Matt Smith who, given, seems like a pretty credible source. I really have no comment on this, or much of a conception of what it would be like. I just thought you all should know! ;)

Matt Smith will regenerate into the 12th Doctor

It would seem timely, would it not? Nevertheless, I think I would be rather disappointed to see him go at this point. I feel like Matt Smith hasn’t had much time to stretch his legs without the Ponds, and if he leaves so soon after their exit, I don’t think I’ll be satisfied that I ever really got to know him at all. I hope this one’s just a rumor.

There are other things planned for the anniversary besides the special

In a recent interview, Moffat has said: “Doctor Who–the 50th–is approaching us with various different things–a lot of different things going on. Don’t believe the nonsense about one sixty-minute film, that’s complete nonsense.” WHAT DOES IT MEAN?!?! More geeking out for sure, but besides that, it seems rather up in the air. Is Moffat referencing things we already know about–like the biopic about the early days of Doctor Who or the new series of tie-in short stories written by prominent authors? Or is it something new? Some have speculated that it might be a series of webisodes bridging the gap between the end of season 7 and the special. I think it’s unlikely that we’ll get extra actual episodes, so I’ll be interested to find out what Moffat is actually talking about here. You can watch the interview, in which the show-runner discusses all manner of things Who, for yourself here, and make up your own mind.

Russel T. Davies (maybe) to pen some Season 8 episodes

Okay, so this isn’t directly related to the anniversary special, but horah! This news comes from the same interview in which Moffat gives his cryptic hint about what will happen with the 50th anniversary special. He says that he would like to have Davies back, but makes no comment as to whether or not Davies has actually been approached. I really want this one to end up being true.

All in all, I’m generally very excited about the direction the 50th Anniversary seems to be taking. In fact, I’m way more excited about the Special than I am about Who’s return at the end of March. Let’s hope it lives up to expectations.

Skipping to Conclusions: Game of Thrones Season 3

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

by Anika

Eeeeeee. I have been excited about the third season of Game of Thrones since the second season ended. It’s such a rich world full of entirely not good but not entirely evil (except Joffrey) characters who are to a person trying to Do Something when Just Surviving is a real accomplishment.

[Aside: I haven't read the books. Of the people I know who have, half have told me I absolutely should, they're engaging and full of depths the TV series can't reach and the other half say I absolutely should not, they will only break my heart, not in the good way -- sound off in comments if you have an opinion!]

Now, finally, a trailer has been released:

Eeeeeee, again! I’m not going to dissect it, but here are the things that jump out at me:

1. Starks Rising

a screencap of Arya Stark hiding

a screencap of Bran Stark shooting an arrow

Arya was the first character who really grabbed me in the series premiere. And I loved her interactions with Tywin Lannister last season, that was brilliant. So of course, I’m excited to see what happens with her. But as far as the Starks go, it was, surprisingly, Bran’s appearance that caught my breath. You go get yours, Bran Stark. (And welcome to the Fandom Archer’s Guild.)

Also, these two could be twins, look at them. I wish the siblings weren’t all so separated, sadface.

2. The Cersei and Sansa Show

a screencap of Cersei looking over her shoulder

a screencap of Sansa looking over her shoulder

Cersei and Sansa fascinate me. And I said I wasn’t going to dissect the trailer but it’s not an accident that these two caps are so similar. It was clear last season: Sansa reminds Cersei of herself and she hates her for it. They are reflections within reflections of visible and invisible power and fragility, strength and vulnerability. It’s fascinating.

I’m worried about both these women going into season three, their fates were ambiguous at the end of last season and the angry caged animal look they both have in the trailer is scaring me.

3. We all hate Joffrey right?

a screencap of Joffrey shouting, in front of a lion emblem

a still of Joffrey teaching Margaery the crossbow

Mostly, I just really wanted to post these two images. The first is a cap from the trailer and I love the Lion emblem behind him. It’s like waving a Lannister flag while Joffrey ‘Baratheon’ makes his horrible statement about tormenting everyone for his pleasure and power play because Joffrey is seriously The Worst and as much I legitimately love the Lannisters, they made him!

And the second, a still from the second episode of season three, is so so creepy but I am tentatively a Margaery cheerleader and also expect the Lannisters to implode when all is said and done.

4. Meanwhile Jaime Lannister

a screencap of Jaime Lannister looking soulful

How fabulous is it that the leather strap around his neck looks like a necktie here? And the wind in his hair? Jaime Lannister: bringing sexy back while imprisoned and dressed in burlap. I don’t KNOW what’s coming for Jaime but I’ve heard and seen enough vague comments to be expecting some kind of redemption arc or similar journey from villain to antihero. Even if that’s wrong, I’m already half in love with him. So.

5. I’m getting the idea GRRM likes brother and sister team ups as much as I do

promotional images of Meera and Jojen Reed, photomanipped together

So, I was pretty excited when I found out the kid from Love, Actually was going to be on Game of Thrones. Then I found out his character has a sister (who I guess is ALSO in the Fandom Archers Guild) and they look like this (awesome) and Sam (who’s reading the books) says they’re my kind of characters. So now I am totally excited!

6. And also dragons.

a screencap of Dany and an army

I’m Daenerys Targaryen. I have a new army. With armor and weapons and a big viking boat.

a screencap of Dany's dragon flying

But most importantly I have dragons.

And more honor + angst than any of you, summed up in this guy.

And more honor + angst than any of you, summed up in this guy.

a screencap of Dany wih fire behind her.

And I am going to watch you burn.

All images from WinterisComing.net and copyright HBO.

Skipping to Conclusions: Hannibal

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

by Anika

NBC’s new Hannibal Lecter television series has a premiere date (Tuesday, April 4) and a teaser:

I first met the good doctor at the 1991 Academy Award Ceremony when The Silence of the Lambs swept the top awards. I hadn’t seen the film or read the books because I don’t like horror films (and because I was 14), but after the Oscars I was intrigued. Plus I grew up idolizing Jodie Foster. So, I watched the movie… and it hit all sorts of buttons. I loved it. Flash forward to today and I’ve read all the books, I’ve seen all the films, and I’m super excited to watch the series.

a promotional photo of Hugh Dancy as Will Graham in Hannibal

Now, Clarice Starling is my spirit animal, not Will Graham (she’s maybe getting a series too but it’s on Lifetime, home of Army Wives and Dance Moms so, Idk). And the film Hannibal is my go to feel-good movie, not Red Dragon (I affectionately call Red Dragon “Ralph Fiennes’s audition for Voldemort”). But Hugh Dancy is great and Laurence Fishbourne, playing Jack Crawford, is greater. If there’s someone I’m worried about it’s Mads Mikkelsen, playing Dr. Lecter himself, but mostly because Anthony Hopkins has owned that part for so long. If Mikkelson and the direction is smart his Hannibal will be creepy-charming in new and different ways.

I do worry that while there are female characters and actresses listed in the cast, no women have appeared in any of the promotional materials (images or the teaser) released so far. I’d think guests Gina Torres, Gillian Anderson, and Anna Chlumsky (who could be playing Clarice lite?) have enough of a following to warrant some publicity. But they have a month and a half to promote the show so I’ll assume we will at least get to see who this is:

a silhouette labeled Caroline Dhavernas as Dr. Alana Bloom

To be fair:

a picture of Hugh Dancy followed by more silhouettes

Basically, NBC: I am unimpressed with your website.

But I’m interested to see where this series goes, particularly how long Hannibal is a secret serial killer. It’d be pretty hilarious if the show runs for some six years with Hannibal eating people on the side all the while, though at that point the Hannibal/Will bromance break-up would be epic!

Anybody else going to watch?

Skipping to Conclusions: Marvel Romance Novels

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

by Anika

I learned about the Marvel Romance novels the way I learn about many things these days: from someone making pithy comments on the internet. Brief and/or sarcastic and/or rude. As a result I was on Yellow Alert when I read the USA Today article myself. And the article has some problematic underlying threads — women don’t get comics because they only like things they can relate to, which means romance, which means heteronormative romance — but that’s the article, not the novels themselves.

The section on the first novel is described as She-Hulk in the City without actually using those words. But it references Mr. Big and is legitimately called The She-Hulk Diaries so you are DEFINITELY supposed to relate her to Carrie Bradshaw.

the covers of Marvel upcoming romance novels

Which, okay. I haven’t read much She-Hulk. I like her fine, but she’s not a character I follow regularly or pick up a book for and I don’t know if writing a novel about her would change that, romance or not. But then the second title was introduced.

Rogue has the ability to steal powers from whoever she touches — but that also means her kiss can be accidentally fatal. After putting a boyfriend in a coma, she hits the road and meets the enigmatic James, and together they go on a trip to escape his dangerous family and for her to come to terms with her own life.

And I realized: Oh! Teen Paranormal Romance.

I have been in more than one room and heard more than one person say something along the lines of “the bookstore creation of the Teen Paranormal Romance section signifies the end of literature” or less hyperbolically “I hate Teen Paranormal Romance”. And every time I hear it, it hurts my heart. About 90% of what I personally write would fall under the umbrella of this derided genre. And a hefty chunk of what I read, too.

Teen Paranormal Romance is the Juliet to my Romeo.

I assume at least half of the TPR haters are really just against its most famous title (Twilight) and at least two thirds of those haven’t read it, they’re just making pithy comments on the internet (or in the dining room). I’m not really upset. So long as the derision doesn’t extend to the audience of teen girls.

The descriptions of these Marvel Romance novels leave me with plenty of questions. She-Hulk is described as a ‘businesswoman’… is she still a lawyer (because, for real, I’ve wanted a Law and Order like drama with superheroes forever)? Is the ‘enigmatic James’ a Logan/Wolverine stand in? Or even actually Logan/Wolverine himself? What other superheroes will appear in these novels? What other superheroines will get the novel treatment? Because I have a list people!

But the conclusion I’m skipping to, the one I want to pass on to our audience is: this is GOOD you guys. If people want to call marketing to women “pandering” to women, so what — it’s better than ignoring us. Now we can have a conversation about subversive sexism and heteronormativity instead of a conversation about visibility or the existence of female fans.

Plus, I can’t wait to read that Rogue novel! Zero irony!

Skipping to Conclusions: The Originals

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

by Gabby

According to these two different sources, The CW is contemplating a Vampire Diaries (TVD) spin-off that could start as early as next season. It would center around the family of the original vampires, including Klaus and Rebekah.

The-Original-Family

There are many elements of this still-developing project that I’m already in love with. Let’s run them down, list-style.

First, the Originals have always been one of my preferred parts of TVD, as they are intrinsically tied with the mythology of the show. As I am not an active “shipper”, I watch weekly to get wrapped up in the historically accurate costumes and stories that the show provides.

Second, the character of Klaus (whom I presume will be the figurehead of the show) is multi-faceted and one of the creepiest creatures on TV. The life of a being that has lived for more than a millenium is bound to be A) super complicated and B) super interesting, and TVD has already explored some of this. I would love to spend more time with this conflicted vampire, who seems to have this really soft side to him. Not only can I see glimpses of this side of him when he speaks to Caroline, but he expresses his emotions through art, which says a lot about who he is. He’s not only the destruction machine that we’ve come to know, but he also has feelings about those actions.

Third, from what I’ve seen so far, the city in which this spin-off will take place is New Orleans. I’ve always had a soft-spot for Louisiana as the home of Cajuns (among other things). Let’s pause for a short history lesson: the word “cajun” derives from “acadian”, which represent the first French settlers to arrive in Eastern Canada, once named Acadia. In 1755, the English took over the lands, expelling and dispersing the Acadian settlers to New England and Europe with the goal of assimilating them to the english way of life. Many Acadians ran away from New England to settle in the as-of-then mostly empty lands of Louisianna, and these French-men are the ancestors of the Cajuns that are there today. As I am myself an Acadian from Eastern Canada (oh yeah, and we claimed back our lands because we’re badass like that), I have deep appreciation for the Cajun culture that seeps out of Louisiana. As such, I’m really excited that New Orleans will be the setting for this new show. It will also offer up many “supernatural” possibilities (as we’ve seen in the episode “We’ll Always Have Bourbon Street”, as well as the occasional Anne Rice reference.

Lastly, Phoebe Tonkin will most likely be involved. In TVD, she is known as the havoc-wreaking werewolf who [SPOILER] double-crossed Tyler, but I remember her most fondly as Faye Chamberlain in the now-cancelled CW series, The Secret Circle.

I mostly only remember her because she reminded me of Fairuza Balk as Nancy in The Craft. And that is a wonderful thing. This girl has acting chops, and I love to hate her in TVD, so I’m excited to get to hate her more in this spin-off (that will hopefully happen).

I must admit that I’ve been tethering on the edge of “I love it!” and “I don’t like that!” in regards to TVD this season (see: the sire bond, the cure). I think that bringing a spin-off into the mix would be beneficial for two reasons. On the one hand, I believe it would actually tighten the storylines in TVD, giving us more time with the “core” characters which would help to develop their motivations and points of views. On the other hand, the spin-off would serve as the more dark, twisted sister to TVD, much like Angel did to Buffy. It would also provide more mythology and background to the show, something that I am totally fine with.

The episode of TVD airing on April 25th will/should serve as the backdoor pilot for the spin-off; I hope that on that day, my excitement will be justified.

Skipping to Conclusions: Star Trek Into Darkness

In geekdom, we see a lot of teasers. Sometimes it’s just an image or the name of a creator, other times it’s a trailer or a simple tag line. Whatever it is, it’s meant to get a reaction from you and start a discussion. Inspired by the anticipation and buzz caused by these teasers, we at Fantastic Fangirls present Skipping to Conclusions in which we speculate about the comics, movies, TV shows, or whatever we’re excited about but hasn’t come out yet.

J.J. Abrams’s second Star Trek film Star Trek Into Darkness hits theaters May 17 and there are trailers, interviews, images, and an extended sneak peek available to dissect, but we still don’t know who the villain played by Benedict Cumberbatch is.

a still from Star Trek Into Darkness featuring John Harrison in a glass prison

I am obviously Loki.

ALI

He’s totally Khan. It’s like when all the official statements for The Dark Knight Rises said “Marion Cotillard is totally NOT Talia Al’Ghul” and then she totally was Talia. We figured it out so they’ve gone into evasive maneuvers. Otherwise, there’s a slim possibility he’s a completely new villain like Eric Bana in the first movie.

ANIKA

I don’t want him to be Khan because why would Khan be vengeful already? I guess I just hope they don’t try to do “Space Seed” AND “Wrath of Khan” in one movie.

SAM

I’m still holding out hope that he’s Gary Mitchell, because “Where No Man Has Gone Before” is one of my favorite episodes of original Trek, and I think it would make for a good modernized Trek story. But, honestly, if he’s Khan I’m not too bothered. I think Cumberbatch is good at a certain type of scenery chewing, and that’s the type of character Khan is.

But that’s not the only question to ponder or conclusion to skip to!

Will Spock — or anyone else — die?

ALI

WHY WOUlD YOU SAY THAT? NO ONE IS GOING TO DIE!*

* someone is totally going to die and I will cry like a baby. also, I really hate when they kill main(ish) characters in a movie.

ANIKA

If someone has to die, I hope it’s not Spock. Kirk or McCoy are the next most logical choices and… well, I really, really don’t want any of them to die. Especially New Kirk, he is my favorite. But I guess I’d prefer him to anyone else. I would find Spock dying to be redundant or lazy, and anyone outside the triumvirate would be a cheap sacrifice. Chekov has been seen in a red shirt…but he’s such a cutie, I’d feel so manipulated if he were killed off. Though I feel manipulated even having this conversation.

I don’t want anyone to die. The end :P

Alice Eve is playing Carol Marcus, who in Trek Prime mothered Kirk’s son, David. Will David be in the rebooted universe? Should he be?

ANIKA

I’m sad she’s not Elizabeth Dehner. I like Dehner because she wears pants and because she figures in the Giant Novel Strangers from the Sky, which I have a silly love for. But I like Carol Marcus fine, and I like David Marcus fine. But I really do not like accidental pregnancy plots and it’s the twenty third century, you know?

SAM

I was disappointed to find out she’s Carol Marcus. It’s not awful, but I’m with Anika and was hoping she was Elizabeth Dehner (because I was hoping Cumberbatch would be Gary Mitchell, like I said, though one could very geekily argue that Marcus gets a mention in “Where No Man Has Gone Before” if one wanted to). I’m also with Anika on the accidental pregnancy plot, which is stupid enough in twenty-first century stories. But I really like the character of Carol, and I like her relationship with Kirk, and her choice to be a single parent who both pursues her career and raises her child, something my own mom did.

Who knows if that’ll happen with the new version, but I’m hopeful.

a still from Star Trek Into Darkness featuring a bruised Spock and Uhura

What are your thoughts on bumps in the road for Spock and Uhura?

ALI

The thing that I loved most about Spock and Uhura was that they were both established as awesome individual characters before we found out they were together. They have a wonderful, grown-up relationship that I love to pieces. That said, no relationship is perfect or without flaws, so I’m actually really eager to see what this movie will throw at them and how they handle it. I also really hope they don’t throw a cheap love triangle/jealousy thing in. I think Uhura and Spock (and their relationship) are better than that.

ANIKA

I love Spock and Uhura. LOVE. Their relationship surprised and charmed me and I am one hundred percent behind it. I’m not at all opposed to bumps, drama or angst but I do want them to make it through.

SAM

Okay. It is very rare that I ever push for a love triangle, or any sort of twist of canonically straight characters into an m/m relationship (ramble for another time), but I would love to see a love triangle with Kirk/Spock/Uhura in which it is an actual love triangle and all three characters have feelings (or whatever, sorry Spock) for each other. I think it would be a great call out to those original slash shippers out there, I think Star Trek is long overdue for a major queer character, and I think we, as an audience, are ready for it. And as insufferable as some people (ahem) on the internet might be afterwards, I think it would be a great story.

But do we like that title?!

ALI

I think people are being a bit silly getting flustered over a title. I mean, there’s a movie currently in theaters called Gangster Squad. Clearly there are worse things than using “trek” as a verb in a movie title (because that’s actually awesome).

ANIKA

I find the title controversy so funny. These same fans all freaked out about the first Abrams film not having a subtitle. Honestly, I actually think it’s cute to use ‘trek’ as a verb? But I also think Attack of the Clones is a cute title, so.

Part of me doesn’t need a trek into darkness. She’d be okay with space hijinks! But most of me is just really excited for more Star Trek.

SAM

I didn’t even know there was a controversy! I mean. Look at all the other Trek titles. I’m not too annoyed by it, and I’m pretty excited for some more Trek. Now if only the female characters could start wearing pants (or the male characters skirts, like they tried in the first season of Next Generation) and I would be so happy. Slightly off topic, I know, but if you can change the way the bridge of the Enterprise looks because you’re modernizing, you can move past the clothing conventions of the late 60s. Just sayin’.

What about you, dear readers? What are your thoughts on these questions or other teased plot points?